This week's episode of The Sporkful podcast is up! Listen through the player or iTunes/Podcasts app. (And please subscribe!)
NOTE: The largest share of our funding comes from YOU. If you want our show to keep going and growing, please support us today. We'll thank you with a limited edition poster from the hot dog sandwich debate, signed by John Hodgman, Brooke Gladstone and me! Please donate today, and thank you!
If you listen to The Sporkful, you know that I have STRONG feelings about what makes a sandwich a sandwich.
You'll also know that I am a staunch sandwich conservative -- some have even called me the Scalia of Sandwiches.
That's because I define a sandwich based on the original intent of the framer of sandwiches, the Earl of Sandwich:
1. You must be able to pick up a sandwich and eat it with your hands without your hands touching the fillings.
2. The fillings must be sandwiched between two discrete food items.
Enter hot dogs and John Hodgman, author, actor, humorist, and host of one of my favorite podcasts, Judge John Hodgman.
During an appearance I made on WNYC's The Leonard Lopate Show in July of 2014, Hodgman called in to debate whether or not a hot dog is a sandwich.
I argued yes, Hodgman argued no -- and a great feud was born.
Hodgman's key argument centered on his definition of a true sandwich as an edible entity that is customarily cut in half before being eaten:
"When you think of an archetypal sandwich, you might not cut it in half but it would not be weird if you did," he said. "If you cut your hot dog in half, people would look at you and wonder what is going on...because a hot dog is an indivisible unique thing."
Listen in to the full episode to find out who the audience picked as the winner, and to hear the shocking twist that came just before the vote. (Yes, hot dogs were involved.)
Photos: Scott Bleicher